US Senator Rand Paul assessments optimistic for coronavirus

US Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, walks to take part in a collection of votes associated to a invoice in response to COVID-19, the novel coronavirus, on the US Capitol in Washington, DC, March 18, 2020. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)

Rand Paul, a critic of emergency coronavirus spending, has change into the primary US senator to check optimistic for COVID-19, the Republican lawmaker’s workplace mentioned Sunday.

An announcement from a workers member mentioned he was in quarantine however remained asymptomatic.

As US senators work on a multi-trillion-dollar rescue package deal to assist the US economic system hit arduous by the pandemic, Paul has not less than twice voted in opposition to such emergency funding.

Paul, who’s 57, is the third member of Congress recognized to have contracted the virus. Two members of the House of Representatives — Ben McAdams of Utah and Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida — earlier introduced optimistic assessments.

Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky, “is feeling fine and is in quarantine. He is asymptomatic and was tested out of an abundance of caution due to his extensive travel and events,” mentioned the assertion from his workers.

It mentioned Paul was not conscious of any direct contact with an contaminated individual. It added that the senator’s Washington workplace had begun working remotely 10 days in the past, so “virtually no staff has had contact with Senator Paul.”

It was not clear precisely when he was examined.

On Wednesday, Paul voted in opposition to a $100 billion stimulus package deal designed to fight the virus.

The invoice, which handed by a 90-Eight vote, referred to as totally free virus testing and paid sick depart for some displaced employees.

The senator, a deficit hawk, argued that Congress ought to pay for the measure by chopping funding for wars or different “frivolous” applications, the Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal reported.

He urged his colleagues to “stop being a rubber stamp for wasteful spending.”

Earlier within the month, he opposed a bipartisan $Eight billion plan for emergency coronavirus funding.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *